Why your AI-built app isn't getting users — and a 30-day plan to fix it.

What you get in 48 hours

• +Written breakdown: what you built, what you think is wrong, what's actually wrong, where this could work if repositioned, what to do in 7 days
• +20-minute Loom — me walking your app + the breakdown, audio only
• +30-day plan: 3-5 concrete moves with rough time estimates
• +Same-day refund if the breakdown isn't sharper than what you already get from Claude / ChatGPT on your own

Why this isn't the same as asking your own AI

When you ask Claude or ChatGPT about your own app, your prompts are leading questions. Your AI agrees with you because YOU framed the prompt. An outside reader uses different prompts and notices things you didn't think to ask about. That's why consultants exist even when clients have access to books.

I also bring my own pattern library — what I've seen across the audits at /audits + 6 months of shipping Cruzar (a US–MX border-crossing app) under the same constraints you're shipping under. Solo, $0, AI tools.

What I usually find in AI-built apps stuck at zero

• 01The hero says what you built, not what it does for the user.
• 02Generic LLM-output positioning — the same five adjectives every other tool uses.
• 03No clear ICP — the page tries to talk to everyone, so it talks to no one.
• 04Distribution mismatch — built for B2B SaaS but launched only on Twitter.
• 05Tool-for-everyone syndrome — “works for marketers, sales, ops, and HR.”
• 06Technical cliff — frontend looks shipped, signup posts to nothing.

Want it ongoing?

If you want me reviewing your app as it changes — 2 diagnoses/month + async DM access — there's a $497/mo retainer.

Free version

Want a public version (anonymous by default) instead? /audit-me — I pick a few each week from the queue, no charge. The diagnoses on this page are private + faster + deeper.